Author Guidelines for Open Access Journals at Reseapro

Publish with confidence. At Reseapro Journals, we provide a streamlined, ethical, and globally visible publishing experience. This page outlines comprehensive author guidelines for open-access journals, ensuring clarity in manuscript submission, publication ethics, peer review, article processing charges (APCs), and post-submission communication. Whether you are submitting a full-length research article, a review, or a case study, these guidelines will help you navigate the publishing process with ease.

Types of Manuscripts Accepted

Reseapro welcome submissions from all fields of science, medicine, engineering, social sciences, humanities, and business. The following types of manuscripts are accepted:

Original Research:

Original Articles present novel findings, innovative methodologies, or significant theoretical contributions derived from research studies. This is the most common type of journal manuscript and is used to publish comprehensive reports of original research data. Manuscripts should include an abstract, clearly defined objectives, detailed methodology, results, and discussion. The standard format consists of the following sections: Introduction, Methods, Results, and Discussion, making it suitable for a wide range of disciplines and study designs.

Review Article:

Review Articles provide comprehensive literature reviews that summarize, analyze, and synthesize existing knowledge within a particular field. These manuscripts present the current state of research, highlight existing gaps, and identify potential future directions. By offering a fundamental background to ongoing studies, review articles serve as valuable resources for researchers and are frequently cited in subsequent publications.

Case Study:

Case Studies present detailed real-world accounts that provide valuable insights into practical applications, systems, or behaviors. These articles report specific instances of noteworthy phenomena, helping researchers recognize and understand the occurrence of unusual, previously unknown, or emerging conditions and events. Commonly published in medical and scientific fields, case studies contribute to the advancement of knowledge by highlighting observations that may guide future research and practice.

Mini Review:

Mini Reviews are concise scholarly articles that provide an overview of recent advances and key developments in a specific research area. They critically summarize important findings from previously published studies, identify current trends and research gaps, and suggest potential directions for future investigations. Mini Reviews offer readers a focused understanding of emerging topics within a limited scope.

Short Communication:

Short Communications are brief research articles that present significant findings, innovative methodologies, or preliminary results that warrant rapid dissemination. Although shorter than full-length research papers, they must provide clear objectives, appropriate methodology, and meaningful conclusions. These articles enable authors to communicate timely and impactful scientific contributions to the research community.

Perspective/Commentary:

Perspective/Commentary articles present expert opinions, interpretations, and viewpoints on recent developments, emerging trends, or ongoing controversies within a specific field. These manuscripts provide critical analysis and scholarly discussion on current issues, offering new perspectives and encouraging academic debate. They are intended to stimulate further research and contribute to the advancement of knowledge.

Editorial:

Editorials are scholarly opinion articles written by editors, members of the editorial board, or invited contributors that reflect on significant topics, emerging issues, or current academic discourse within a field. These articles provide insights, commentary, and informed perspectives intended to stimulate discussion and enhance understanding among researchers and readers.

Letters to the Editor:

Letters to the Editor are brief communications that provide comments, critiques, or additional insights on previously published articles or current issues of scientific and academic importance. These letters encourage scholarly discussion, allow authors and readers to exchange viewpoints, and contribute to the ongoing advancement of knowledge within the field.

Ethical Responsibilities of Authors

This journal is committed to upholding the integrity of the scientific record. As a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics COPE the journal will follow the COPE guidelines on how to deal with potential acts of misconduct.

Authors must report research findings accurately, honestly, and transparently. Any form of fabrication, falsification, manipulation, or misrepresentation of data is strictly prohibited. Authors are expected to adhere to the principles of Good Scientific Practice throughout the research and publication process.

  • The manuscript should not be submitted to more than one journal for simultaneous consideration.
  • The submitted work should be original and should not have been published elsewhere in any form or language (partially or in full), unless the new work concerns an expansion of previous work. Please provide transparency on the re-use of material to avoid the concerns about text-recycling ('self-plagiarism').
  • Results should be presented clearly, honestly, and without fabrication, falsification or inappropriate data manipulation (including image based manipulation). Authors should adhere to discipline-specific rules for acquiring, selecting and processing data.

Important note: the journal may use software to screen for plagiarism.

  • Research articles and non-research articles (e.g. Opinion, Review, and Commentary articles) must cite appropriate and relevant literature in support of the claims made. Excessive and inappropriate self-citation or coordinated efforts among several authors to collectively self-cite is strongly discouraged.
  • Authors are strongly advised to ensure the author group, the Corresponding Author, and the order of authors are all correct at submission. Adding and/or deleting authors during the revision stages is generally not permitted, but in some cases may be warranted. Reasons for changes in authorship should be explained in detail. Please note that changes to authorship cannot be made after acceptance of a manuscript.
  • Upon request authors should be prepared to send relevant documentation or data in order to verify the validity of the results presented. This could be in the form of raw data, samples, records, etc. Sensitive information in the form of confidential or proprietary data is excluded.

If there is any suspicion of research misconduct, the journal will investigate the matter in accordance with COPE (Committee on Publication Ethics) guidelines. The author(s) will be contacted and given an opportunity to respond before any decision is made.

If misconduct is confirmed, the journal may take one or more of the following actions:

  • Before publication: The manuscript may be rejected.
  • After publication: The published article may be corrected (through an erratum or correction notice) or retracted, depending on the nature and severity of the misconduct. The reason for the correction or retraction will be clearly stated.
  • Institutional notification: The author's affiliated institution may be informed if necessary.

Role of the Corresponding Author

One author is assigned as Corresponding Author and acts on behalf of all co-authors, ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately addressed.

The Corresponding Author is responsible for the following requirements:

  • Ensuring that all listed authors have approved the manuscript before submission, including the names and order of authors.
  • Managing all communication between the Journal and all co-authors, before and after publication.
  • Providing transparency on re-use of material and mentioning any unpublished material, for example manuscripts in press, included in the manuscript in a cover letter to the Editor.
  • Making sure disclosures, declarations, and transparency on data statements from all authors are included in the manuscript as appropriate.

* The requirement of managing all communication between the journal and all co-authors during submission and proofing may be delegated to a Contact or Submitting Author. In this case, the Corresponding Author should be clearly indicated in the manuscript.

Submission Process

All manuscripts must be submitted through Reseapro's secure Editorial Management System (EMS).

What to Include:

  • Manuscript (in .docx or .pdf format)
  • Cover Letter stating manuscript title, type, and author information
  • Conflict of interest and funding disclosure
  • Author list with full affiliation and ORCID ID (if available)

Initial editorial screening (plagiarism check, scope match) is completed within 24–48 hours.

Peer Review Policy

Reseapro Journals follows a double-blind peer review process to ensure a fair, unbiased, and confidential evaluation of all submitted manuscripts. During the review process, the identities of both the authors and the reviewers remain confidential.

Author Requirements for Double-Blind Review

Authors must ensure that the submitted manuscript is fully anonymized before submission. The following requirements must be followed:

  • Remove all author names, affiliations, email addresses, ORCID IDs, and any other identifying information from the manuscript and all supplementary files.
  • Submit a separate Title Page containing the manuscript title, full author names, institutional affiliations, corresponding author details, acknowledgements, funding information, conflict of interest declarations, and any other author-related information.
  • Avoid self-identifying statements or citations that may reveal the identity of the authors. If self-citations are necessary, they should be written in a manner that preserves anonymity during the review process.

Editorial and Review Process

  • Each manuscript undergoes an initial editorial assessment to determine its suitability for the journal's scope, quality, and compliance with the submission guidelines.
  • Manuscripts that successfully pass the initial assessment are assigned to at least two independent expert reviewers for double-blind peer review.
  • Reviewers evaluate the manuscript based on scientific quality, originality, methodology, ethical compliance, clarity, significance, and overall contribution to the field.
  • Based on the reviewers' recommendations, the editorial office may request minor revision, major revision, acceptance, or rejection of the manuscript.
  • Revised manuscripts may be returned to the original reviewers for further evaluation when necessary.
  • The Editor-in-Chief or an authorized Associate Editor has the final authority to make the publication decision after considering the reviewers' comments and the authors' revisions.
  • All information related to the peer review process is treated as strictly confidential by the editorial office, reviewers, and editors.

Article Processing Charges (APCs)

As a fully open-access journal, Reseapro Journals makes published articles freely available to readers worldwide without subscription or access fees. To support editorial processing, peer-review management, manuscript handling, digital publication, DOI registration, indexing preparation, hosting, and long-term archiving, an Article Processing Charge (APC) is applicable only after final editorial acceptance of the manuscript.

APC payment does not influence editorial assessment, peer-review outcomes, or acceptance decisions. Manuscripts are evaluated based on scholarly merit, journal scope, ethical compliance, and editorial standards.

Standard APC

ItemAmount / Timing
Standard Article Processing ChargeUSD 1,019
When payableAfter final editorial acceptance and during the galley proof stage
Submission feeNo APC is payable at submission stage

Country-Based APC Discounts

Country-based APC discounts are applied according to the World Bank Group income classification of the corresponding author’s primary institutional affiliation, unless otherwise determined by the Editorial Office for exceptional cases.

Country GroupDiscountEstimated payable APC
High-income0%USD 1,019.00
Middle-income35%USD 662.35
Low-income55%USD 458.55

*Classification is based on World Bank income groups.

What the APC Covers

The APC supports the editorial, technical, screening, production, and publishing services required to maintain a transparent and high-quality open-access publication process.

Editorial and Peer-Review Services

  • Initial manuscript screening and editorial quality assessment
  • Editorial handling and manuscript management
  • Coordination of peer review and reviewer communication
  • Editorial decision-making and revision management
  • Reviewer assessment processing and quality monitoring

Manuscript Screening and Quality Compliance

  • Plagiarism similarity assessment using standard screening tools such as Turnitin or equivalent systems
  • AI-generated or AI-assisted content screening, where applicable, along with editorial compliance evaluation
  • Similarity report evaluation and publication-quality compliance checks
  • Scope and publication suitability assessment
  • Ethical and publication standards compliance review
  • Manuscript structure, formatting, and journal guideline compliance checks

Manuscript Preparation and Production Services

  • Technical manuscript checking and formatting review
  • Language and grammatical quality review, where applicable
  • Copyediting and editorial corrections
  • Manuscript layout preparation and publication formatting
  • Galley proof preparation and author proof-correction support

Publishing, DOI, and Metadata Services

  • DOI registration and maintenance through Crossref
  • Article metadata preparation and dissemination
  • Reference linking and citation integration
  • Digital object management and scholarly-record maintenance

Indexing, Hosting, and Archiving Services

  • Digital hosting and website publication
  • Long-term content preservation and archiving support
  • Indexing preparation and metadata distribution to relevant databases
  • Search engine discoverability and online accessibility enhancement
  • Continuous platform maintenance and article availability

Open Access and Dissemination Services

  • Immediate full open-access publication without subscription barriers
  • Worldwide accessibility and dissemination of published research
  • Permanent online article availability
  • Improved discoverability and global research visibility

APC Discounts, Waivers, and Publication Support

The journal is committed to supporting equitable and accessible scholarly publishing. In addition to country-based APC discounts, authors may be considered for additional fee reductions based on manuscript quality, editorial assessment, and compliance with journal publication standards.

In exceptional cases, manuscripts demonstrating strong academic quality and full compliance with publication requirements may be considered for partial APC discounts or full publication support (Zero APC), subject to editorial evaluation and approval.

Eligibility for additional discounts or APC waivers may be assessed using the following criteria:

  • Plagiarism similarity should generally be below 15%, based on standard screening tools and editorial review.
  • AI-assisted or AI-generated content indicators should generally be below 30%, where such screening is used; screening results are treated as indicators and not as the sole basis for decision-making.
  • The manuscript must be properly formatted and structured according to journal guidelines.
  • The manuscript should align with the journal’s scope, editorial standards, and publication criteria.
  • Reviewer comments, where applicable, should be minor in nature and should not require substantial revisions.

Meeting the above criteria does not automatically guarantee an APC waiver, discount, or free publication. Final decisions regarding fee reductions, waivers, or publication support remain at the discretion of the Editorial Office based on editorial assessment, publication suitability, and available support capacity.

Requests for APC waivers, discounts, or financial consideration should be submitted at the time of initial manuscript submission. Requests submitted after editorial acceptance may not be considered.

Payment Options

Authors may complete APC payments through secure payment methods, including:

  • Bank transfer
  • PayPal
  • Institutional payment systems or university payment portals
  • Secure online payment link shared upon manuscript acceptance

APC Payment Timeline

APCs become payable only after final editorial acceptance of the manuscript. The applicable APC payment must be completed during the galley proof stage before publication. Authors will receive the final galley proof for review, and publication processing will proceed only after APC payment confirmation has been received.

Manuscripts will not be scheduled for final publication until the APC payment process has been completed.

Refund Policy

APC payments made after publication are non-refundable. APCs paid for manuscripts that have entered production, galley proof preparation, or final publication processing may not be eligible for refund, except in exceptional circumstances approved by the Editorial Office.

If a refund is approved, any applicable bank charges, currency conversion fees, gateway charges, or administrative deductions may be deducted from the refundable amount where applicable.

Transparency and Compliance Statement

The journal maintains transparency in APC communication and does not request APC payment before final editorial acceptance. APCs support open-access publication services and do not purchase acceptance, peer-review approval, citation outcomes, indexing guarantees, or editorial preference.

The Editorial Office may review and update this APC policy periodically to reflect operational requirements, international publishing standards, and changes in external classification systems used for discount eligibility.

Article Withdrawal Policy

Reseapro Journals is committed to maintaining integrity, transparency, and ethical standards in scholarly publishing. This policy is intended to ensure fairness, accountability, and responsible editorial practice for authors, reviewers, editors, and the academic community.

The journal follows internationally accepted principles of publication ethics and editorial best practices. Manuscript withdrawal requests are handled in accordance with ethical publishing standards and with reference to the guidance of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE), wherever applicable.

Authors are strongly encouraged to review this policy carefully before submitting a manuscript. A manuscript remains under editorial consideration until the journal issues written confirmation of withdrawal.

Withdrawal Request Before Editorial Processing (Within 7 Days)

Authors may request manuscript withdrawal within seven (7) days of submission without any withdrawal or administrative charge, provided the manuscript has not substantially progressed through editorial screening, technical checks, or publication preparation.

During this period, withdrawal requests may be processed without financial obligation to the author.

Withdrawal After Editorial Processing (After 7 Days and Before Peer Review)

If a manuscript is withdrawn after seven (7) days of submission and editorial or administrative processing has already commenced, an editorial and administrative processing charge may apply to cover costs incurred by the journal.

Where manuscript handling activities, including pre-QC, plagiarism screening, editorial evaluation, formatting assessment, compliance verification, manuscript administration, communication, and technical processing have already been completed, authors may be required to pay 25% of the standard Article Processing Charge (APC).

This charge reflects the editorial resources, technical assessment, manuscript handling, and administrative services already invested in manuscript processing.

Withdrawal During or After Peer Review

If the manuscript has entered or completed the peer-review process, an editorial and administrative processing charge may apply to cover reviewer coordination, editorial oversight, peer-review administration, manuscript evaluation, and associated publication-management activities.

Authors may be required to pay 50% of the standard Article Processing Charge (APC). Withdrawal requests at this stage will be evaluated in accordance with ethical editorial practices and publication standards.

Withdrawal After Revision, Editorial Correction, or Formatting Stage

If a manuscript is withdrawn after revision submission, editorial correction, technical editing, formatting, layout preparation, or post-review manuscript processing, an administrative and editorial processing charge may apply because substantial editorial work has already been completed.

Authors may be required to pay 60% of the standard Article Processing Charge (APC). This charge covers editorial handling, manuscript preparation, formatting, production support, and publication-workflow management.

Withdrawal After Galley Proof and Before Publication

Where a manuscript has progressed to the galley-proof, final proofreading, or publication-preparation stage, withdrawal requests may result in an administrative and publication processing charge because substantial editorial, technical, and production work has already been completed.

Authors may be required to pay 75% of the standard Article Processing Charge (APC). This includes costs related to proofreading, production preparation, formatting, typesetting, and publication-workflow activities.

Withdrawal Charge Summary

The following summary is provided for clarity. The applicable charge depends on the manuscript stage and the editorial or production work already completed.

StageManuscript StatusPossible Charge
Before editorial processingWithin 7 days and not substantially processedNo withdrawal or administrative charge
After editorial processingAfter 7 days and before peer reviewUp to 25% of standard APC
During or after peer reviewPeer review entered or completedUp to 50% of standard APC
After revision/correction/formattingPost-review or production preparation work completedUp to 60% of standard APC
After galley proof and before publicationGalley proof, final proofreading, or publication preparation startedUp to 75% of standard APC

Procedure for Withdrawal Requests

All withdrawal requests must be submitted formally by the corresponding author to the Editorial Office. The request should include:

  • Manuscript title
  • Manuscript ID, if assigned
  • Clear reason for withdrawal
  • Confirmation or consent of co-authors, where applicable

The manuscript shall remain under editorial consideration until written confirmation of withdrawal is formally issued by the journal.

The Editorial Office reserves the right to review withdrawal requests and apply relevant editorial procedures where necessary to ensure compliance with ethical publication standards.

Ethical Withdrawal Practices

Authors are expected to adhere to responsible publication ethics throughout the editorial and peer-review process. The following practices may be considered unethical:

  • Simultaneous submission of the same manuscript to multiple journals
  • Withdrawal after extensive editorial or peer-review investment solely for submission elsewhere
  • Republishing or submitting the same manuscript without formal withdrawal approval
  • Failure to respond to editorial communication while editorial processing remains active

Where unethical publication practices are identified, the journal may apply appropriate editorial measures, including temporary restrictions on future submissions and additional editorial review procedures.

Post-Publication Policy

Once published, articles become part of the permanent scholarly record and generally cannot be withdrawn.

In cases involving serious ethical concerns, plagiarism, duplicate publication, copyright infringement, fabricated or unreliable data, or major scientific errors affecting the validity of the scholarly record, the journal may issue a correction, expression of concern, or retraction in accordance with accepted publication-ethics practices and COPE guidance, where applicable.

For withdrawal requests or policy-related concerns, authors should contact the Editorial Office through the journal's official communication channels.

Policy Compliance Statement

Reseapro Journals is committed to ethical editorial decision-making and responsible publication standards. The journal follows publication-ethics principles and considers relevant recommendations and guidance from the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) in manuscript handling, withdrawal requests, corrections, and editorial decision-making.

Copyright and Licensing

All published articles are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY). Authors retain copyright.

This means:

  • Articles are freely accessible and reusable, provided attribution is given.
  • Readers can build upon published work for educational and non-commercial use.

Contact Us

For support on submissions, APC waivers, membership queries, or technical issues:

WhatsApp Chat